DDU are delighted to have received a letter from the Prime Minister acknowledging our work in relation to the CRED Report. As ever, it’s a collective effort so thanks to all involved in producing the open letter, the response and the public meeting!
VIDEO: DDU members discuss the CRED report with some of the report’s commissioners.
Are you a parent worried about your child being told that they are either privileged or oppressed because of their skin colour? We’ve written a guide on how their school may be breaching legal obligations, and how to raise this tricky subject. Read more
DDU’s response to the CRED Report
Sign our open letter to the Prime Minister
DDU asked liberal Muslims for their views on their experiences of life in Britain and their thoughts on the term “Islamaphobia”.
Read DDU’s response to the recommendations on education in the CRED Report.
The CRED Report does not deny that racism exists, but it does maintain that not all disparities are incontrovertible proof of racism. Like any report, it has limitations and will not please everyone, but DDU welcomes it as a robust attempt to bring some objectivity into what has become an increasingly fraught and subjective discussion… Continue Reading…
Public Meeting: How Accusations of Islamophobia Are Used to Silence Dissent. In the wake of the Batley Grammar School incident, five people of Muslim heritage have spoken out against against Islamist extremism and in favour of a liberal society. They are worried that accusations of ‘Islamophobia’ are used by Islamists and so-called liberals to silence… Continue Reading…
In early March DDU wrote an open letter to the FA expressing our concern over its ambivalent stance regarding BLM and players taking the knee (you can read our original letter here). We received a prompt reply that fails to address any substantial points and shows a lack of foresight regarding the impact its policy… Continue Reading…
We argue that the introduction of subjective criteria, combined with existing practical problems, exacerbates the likelihood of negative consequences of hate crime legislation.
Does hate speech law need to be updated or clarified? How has the situation changed in universities in the two years since the Committee’s report on the issue? Does everyone have equal protection of their right to freedom of expression?
Two DDU supporters argue why many universities are wrong to uncritically embrace the Universities UK Report, ‘Tackling Racial Harassment in Higher Education’
We reply to an open letter in the Guardian from education academics that criticises recent government pronouncements on the need for political neutrality and balanced presentation when dealing with political ideas.
Don’t Divide Us Statement
Dear fellow citizens
In the wake of the horrifying and brutal killing of George Floyd, many in the UK expressed heartfelt solidarity; widespread protests showed a genuine commitment to opposing racism. Since then, however, activists, corporations and institutions seem to have seized the opportunity to exploit Floyd’s death to promote an ideological agenda that threatens to undermine British race relations.
The power of this ideology lies in the fear it inspires in those who would otherwise speak out, whatever their ethnicity. But speak out we must. We must oppose and expose the racial division being sown in the name of anti-racism.
The consequences of this toxic, racialised agenda are counter-productive and serious. We are all being divided by tactics and narratives many of us know to be untrue:
- By splitting society into black lives or white lives, racial identity is being used to define who we all are and how we should fight injustice, as opposed to building a united movement to improve life for everyone.
- Those who favour the identity-based politics of grievance and academic critical race theory are redefining racism. The achievements of civil rights movements in the past – that effected positive material impacts on the lives of ethnic minorities and increased equal treatment – are now being denied and undermined by those who claim racism is on the rise.
- Demands that millions of people accept uncritically a prescriptive ‘white privilege’ agenda or be dubbed ignorant, racist or in denial is creating new tensions.
- Under soulless acronyms such as BAME and POC, all ethnic minorities are robbed of individual agency, and assumed to be victims of injustice.
- Free speech is being eroded by a McCarthyite culture of conformity in which to question the new dogma means to risk one’s livelihood and reputation.
- Calls for the wholesale destruction of historical statues, symbols and works of art are fuelling an unhealthy war against the past and stirring up culture wars in the present.
- An obsessive focus on the impact of colonialism threatens to turn history into a morality tale, rather than a complex, three-dimensional understanding of the past.
- The common conflation of the issue of race in the US with the UK (in relation to criminal justice, for example) is unhelpful as it makes it difficult to discuss our specific historical circumstances and the contemporary challenges we face.
We are committed to supporting open-minded, fact-based investigation into the roots of our many social problems but reject simplistic explanations that reduce all injustice to racial factors.
We are dismayed at the moral cowardice of political and cultural institutions that refuse to speak out in defence of tolerant citizens who are being targeted as though their skin colour is synonymous with ‘unconscious’ bigotry.
We oppose the notion of collective guilt, and support the goals of those who have struggled to ensure that individuals are judged by the content of the character and not the colour of their skin.
We reject the proposition that the UK is inherently racist in 2020, with racial prejudice embedded into our educational, cultural and legal institutions. We salute the struggles of earlier generations of civil rights activists and the progress they made in defeating racist discrimination and attitudes.
We want a genuine movement to fight for equality of treatment. Where racism exists, it should be unapologetically challenged. We oppose those ideologues who seek to irrevocably damage our society by hijacking this important cause. We also oppose the opportunistic far right groups who are already exploiting this new climate of fear and disunity.
We will not be divided – by reactionary racists or culture warriors – who refuse to see us as individuals beyond our skin colour.
Janella Ajeigbe, headteacher
Katharine Birbalsingh, headteacher
Ben Cobley, author, The Tribe
William Clouston, party leader, The Social Democratic Party
Andrew Doyle, writer; comedian
Dr Rakib Ehsan, research fellow, HJS
Simon Evans, comedian
Dr Ashley Frawley, sociologist
Inaya Folarin Iman, writer; free speech activist
Francis Foster, comedian
Claire Fox, director, Academy of Ideas
Tarjinder Gill, teacher; All In Britain
Manick Govinda, independent arts consultant
Ben Habib, businessman; co-founder, Unlocked; former MEP
Courtney Hamilton, writer
Ash Hirani, South East Hindu Association
Ed Husain, author The House of Islam: A Global History
Ike Ijeh, architect; writer
Christina Jordan, former MEP, South West England
Esther K, YouTuber; author, Graduating Into Adulthood
Lesley Katon, campaigner; creative & communications director
Ramsha Khan, student journalist
Vishal Khatri, aviation professional
Konstantin Kisin, comedian
Kulvinder Singh Manik, GP
Patsy Murrell, Project Manager
Mercy Muroki, political commentator; student
Masimba Musodza, writer
Sarah Peace, artist
Bhimji Pindoria, president, South East Hindu Association
Helen Pluckrose, editor-in-chief, Areo
Calvin Robinson, school leader; teacher
Dr Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, educator; writer
Elizabeth Smith, writer
Professor Doug Stokes, director, Centre for Advanced International Studies
Zuby, musician; rapper; podcast host; author